Global Empire
Ukrainian Crisis
The New Cold War and the New Nazis
Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Europe. Ukraine ranked 144 of 177 countries worldwide according to the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2013. There are regular fights in the Ukrainian parliament among its corrupt politicians. Some people even made fight compilations on Youtube. Nevertheless the western power elite wanted to get that country in the EU, NATO and IMF. Historically and geographically Ukraine is part of the Russian sphere of influence and eastern Ukraine is populated by Russian Ukrainians. This is of course central to the Ukrainian crisis. Zbigniew Brzezinski was a very influential policy advisor in the United States who co-founded the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller and he was a participant in the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group. In his book The Grand Chessboard he wrote Without Ukraine Russia ceases to be empire, while with Ukraine - bought off first and subdued afterwards, it automatically turns into empire. So the western elite want to have Ukraine in their sphere of influence in order to weaken Russia. In order to understand the Ukrainian Crisis we must first understand the concept of so-called Colour Revolutions which, not by coincidence, happened around Russia on many occasions...
Colour revolutions
Over the past several decades, the "regime changes" approach has been embraced by both neocons and liberal interventionists and has been implemented by both Republican and Democratic administrations. Sometimes, it's done through war and other times through "color revolutions" — always under the idealistic guise of "democracy promotion" or "protecting human rights."
Colour revolutions are revolutions sponsored by powerful elite through their NGO's and organizations in order to overthrow a government and replace it with one that benefits the elite who sponsor them, i.e. regime change. These usually start with massive mass media propaganda and the good versus evil tactic. This is nothing new, throughout history revolutions have been sponsored by the ultra-rich in order to influence world events in favor of their own agenda. Organizations involved are often so-called non-governmental organisations (NGOs) owned or sponsored by the super-rich. One of such billionaires is George Soros...
George Soros is a billionaire with much influence on world events. In 2016 he ranked number 46 in the club of richest persons in the world. He set up a foundation which has been meddling with Ukraine's national affairs for a long time. In May 2014 he said Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now. George Soros is for example behind the so-called Rose Revolution and other revolutions in the world. This is how power works in the real world. There are even investigations into Soros' influence in Europe. So there is absolutely no question that these elite influence world events in their favor. Later more about Soros' involvement in this Ukrainian Crisis. Another important aspect of these colour revolutions is of course propaganda...
According to Wikipedia the Ukraine Crisis Media Center (UCMC) is another so-called non-governmental organisation. But how "non-governmental" are these kind of organizations? Some of the western leaders who spoke at this media center are Anders Fogh Rasmussen, head of NATO, United States senator John McCain, Alexander Hug from OSCE, and United States Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland. UCMC even creates images of Rasmussen with anti-Russian quotes. So, obviously, UCMC is part of the western anti-Russia propaganda machine. Its sponsors are for example George Soros, Ukraine, The Netherlands, United States, Germany, and none other than NATO, the military machine of the western world which is led by the United States. UCMC is promoted on the websites of those sponsors and vice versa. For example George Soros' International Renaissance Foundation has articles like 'Brussels and Kyiv Join Efforts Revealing Kremlin Propaganda'. The majority of ignorant sheeple of course falls for this kind of obvious propaganda. Another good example of western-backed Ukrainian propaganda is Hromadske.TV, another so-called non-governmental organisation used by the western power elite. Hromadske.TV was started by Roman Skrypin who worked for Radio Free Europe, an American funded propaganda station in Europe, set up after WWII to promote Atlanticism and Americanization for the power elite. Here are Hromadske.TV's sponsors...

source screenshot
So Hromadske.TV is obviously yet another propaganda station sponsored by the same western power elite. In 2016 Hromadske.TV was involved in a corruption scandal.
Orange Revolution
There were then important international players seeking to influence Ukrainian politics. How far they did so is a contentious matter. Changes in the technology of global information and communication since the late 20th century have implications for politics and the ways that political power might be exerted. 'Soft power' through democracy promotion and 'people's power' has become a major social constituent of political change and one of the key components of American foreign policy, especially in the post-communist societies (Nye 2004). Soft power was clearly a potent instrument for use in Ukraine.
The Orange Revolution in 2004 was sponsored by the Anglo-American power elite in order to prevent a pro-Russian government from taking power in Ukraine. Soft power involves mass media and propaganda but also financial aid. The Guardian, at that time still a "decent" newspaper, reported that the idea for the revolution was an American creation, a sophisticated and brilliantly conceived exercise in western branding and mass marketing that, in four countries in four years, has been used to try to salvage elections and topple unsavoury regimes.
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s NATO, the military alliance of the western power elite, militarily expanded from Western Europe towards the Russian border despite agreements made with Russian elite to not expand. The European Union also expanded towards the Russian border. The Anglo-American and European elite want to add Ukraine to their sphere of influence, out of the Russian sphere of influence. In March 2012 the EU Association Agreement for Ukraine was initialed in Brussels. By 2013 Ukraine had clearly become a pawn in the power play between the EU and US on one side and Russia on the other. It was logical to expect Russia to intervene. Ukraine is its neighbour and a long time ally. Both countries are important to each other and Russia would never simply sit back and watch while the EU and US take over all countries around it. If Russia would be creeping up to the US by aligning with Mexico or Canada the US would surely be furious. We all know how the United States responded to cooperation between Cuba and the Soviet Union in 1962.

In September 2013 Russia warned Ukraine that if the country goes ahead with a planned agreement on free trade with the EU, it faces inevitable financial catastrophe and possibly the collapse of the state. On 21 November 2013 the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement was stalled by Russia-friendly Ukrainian Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych and his government. The agreement was also tied to a 17 billion dollars loan from the International Monetary Fund. The rejection of the EU agreement sparked protests, the so-called Euromaidan, from pro-European Ukrainians. These protests were heavily supported by the western elite of the US and the EU.
Far from "organic," the movement was heavily subsidized and sponsored by the US government. Before the crisis, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland bragged about the US "investing" $5 billion in "helping" Ukraine become more western-oriented.
In the photo we see US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt and US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland distributing bread to protesters in Ukraine on 11 December 2013, supporting the political protest. The western elite were openly spreading pro-western and anti-Russia propaganda. After Yanukovych and Putin signed the Ukrainian–Russian action plan on 17 December 2013 the situation in Ukraine quickly escalated...
Signs of fascism and neo-Nazi extremism were evident during the Euromaidan protest with right-wing vigilante groups rising to prominence amid violence and police crackdowns. Anton Shekhovtsov wrote that The authorities have been making use of paid instigators who infiltrate the protests and then start attacking the police to provoke a ‘retaliatory’ suppression of the ‘violent protestors.’ Svoboda, Right Sector, Patriot of Ukraine, and Social-National Assembly neo-Nazis spread their terror at the Euromaidan as they attacked government police and anything pro-Russian. In 2014 the neo-Nazi Azov Batallion military unit was incorporated into the National Guard of Ukraine. BBC Newsnight even made a documentary called 'Neo-Nazi threat in new Ukraine'. The Euromaidan protests were used by neo-Nazi parties in Ukraine in order to overthrow the pro-Russian government at that time. Some of their leaders were openly supported by the western power elite in order to achieve their desired regime change. One of them was Ukrainian neo-Nazi Oleh Tyahnybok, making the Hitler salute in the picture above. In June 2013 he was banned from entering the United States for his open anti-Semitism. But during the Ukrainian Crisis he was used by the western elite...
In this picture Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland with neo-Nazi Oleh Tyahnybok, Vitaly Klitschko and Arseniy Yatseniuk on 10 December 2013.
In this picture US Senator John McCain wines and dines with neo-Nazi Oleh Tyahnybok, Arseniy Yatsenyuk and others in Kiev on 14 December 2013.
In this picture US Senators Chris Murphy and John McCain share the stage with neo-Nazi Oleh Tyahnybok during a Pro-European Union rally in Independence Square in Kiev on 15 December 2013. At his visit to Ukraine John McCain said that Ukraine will make Europe better and Europe will make Ukraine better. By supporting neo-Nazis.
In this picture High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton with Neo-Nazi Oleh Tyahnybok on 4 February 2014.
In this picture Secretary of State John Kerry with Vitali Klitschko, Petro Poroshenko, neo-Nazi Oleh Tyahnybok and Sergey Tigipko in Kiev on 4 March 2014.
In this picture Vice President of the United States Joe Biden with neo-Nazi Oleh Tyahnybok in Kiev on 22 April 2014. Since April 2014 Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden gained a position on the board at Burisma Holdings, Ukraine's largest private gas firm, which is run by Ukraine's top criminal Mykola Zlochevsky.
So what were these U.S. and EU officials doing meddling with national affairs in Ukraine right next to the Russian border? Obviously, the western power elite were supporting protests against the democratically chosen pro-Russian government. These photos were taken when they were discussing the new government as part of the regime change. What would happen if a Russian diplomat were to support anti-American protests in Canada or Mexico, let alone discuss regime change in disfavor of the United States anywhere?
Andriy Parubiy is another neo-Nazi leader from Ukraine. He founded the Patriot of Ukraine party and the Social-National Party of Ukraine. The Patriot of Ukraine later branched into the Azov Battalion and Right Sektor, two fascist groups with paramilitary tendencies that were critical in the Maidan revolution...
Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland with neo-Nazi Andriy Parubiy at the United States Department of State on 22 June 2016.
President of PACE Pedro Agramunt with Neo-Nazi Andriy Parubiy.
NATO Deputy Secretary General Alexander Vershbow with Neo-Nazi Andriy Parubiy on 19 May 2014 at NATO HQ to participate in NATO-Ukraine High Level Joint Working Group on Defence Reform. Neo-Nazi Andriy Parubiy even visited the United States, Canada and Great Britain were he lobbied for weapons for Ukraine.
Another neo-Nazi supported by the west was Dmytro Yarosh, a leader of the Right Sector movement. In the picture he speeches during a rally on Independence Square in Kiev on 21 February 2014. In an interview with TIME, Yarosh, whose militant brand of nationalism rejects all foreign influence over Ukrainian affairs, revealed for the first time that Pravy Sektor had amassed a lethal arsenal of weapons. From the west of course.
Colonel General Viktor Muzhenko, Chief of General Staff, and Dmytro Yarosh agreed the format of cooperation between 'Pravy Sektor' and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. ... 'Pravyi Sector' is ready to be subordinated to military leaders in issues related to defense of state from the external enemy.
In 2015 neo-Nazi Dmytro Yarosh was promoted to Advisor of Viktor Muzhenko, Chief of General Staff of the Ukrainian army. NATO has openly stated that it wants to add this army to its own coalition in the not so distant future. Of course all these facts are not something that the western power elite and their media want you to know too much about, but fortunately they cannot censor all information and pictures from the internet. The Obama administration has vehemently denied charges that Ukraine's nascent regime is stock full of neo-fascists despite clear evidence suggesting otherwise. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Regime change
In an interview with the Voice of Russia, University of Illinois Professor Francis Boyle says that there is no real government in Ukraine right now, and called it a gang of neo-Nazis, fascists and rightist thugs. There is clear cut discrimination against Russians in Ukraine with public demands in Kiev that Russians be killed. According to Professor Boyle what happened in Kiev was a playbook coup d'état by the CIA. Victoria Nuland, the Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs, working with the US Ambassador, were instrumental in carrying out the coup d'état, as it has been proven they were working with "the brown shirts": Svoboda, the right sector, the Bandera Nazis and skinheads.
On 22 February 2014 a western-backed coup took place in Ukraine. On 11 March 2014 CIA Director John O. Brennan said at the Council on Foreign Relations, which is run by the ultra-rich, that Over the past several months, the CIA and its Intelligence Community partners have closely followed events in Ukraine. In April 2014 he traveled to Kiev. The CIA is known for orchestrating many overt and covert regime changes throughout its existence. In a leaked phone call US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt talked about a regime change. In that phone call she also famously said Fuck the EU which again supports the idea that the US has the final say in events in Europe, not the EU. The transcript of that leaked phone call strongly suggests that the US has very clear ideas about what the outcome should be and is striving to achieve these goals. Even US President Barack Obama said in a CNN interview that the Anglo-American elite had brokered a deal to transition power in Ukraine.
In the photo George Soros talks to Petro Poroshenko, the pro-American and anti-Russian puppet installed by the west with the western-backed coup. He admitted to financing the 2013-2014 Maidan Square protests that brought the current government into power. On 12 November 2015 Poroshenko awarded Soros with the so-called Order of Freedom. Birds of a feather flock together and they like to stick feathers up each others' asses.
Article 108 of the Ukrainian Constitution specifies that the president may lose office in only 4 situations, resignation, medical incapacity, impeachment or death. Technically speaking the Ukrainian parliament did not remove Yanukovych from office but merely voted to accept Yanukovych's "voluntary renunciation of duties." The fact that 328 votes were cast in a 449 member assembly requiring 337 votes for an impeachment settles this issue beyond doubt. Ultimately, regardless of the West's assertions on any other point, the fact is that Yanukovych was elected to power via elections declared fair by Western monitors themselves. As Kym Bergman has commented, baying mobs, no matter what their size, present no justification to remove a constitutionally elected president from power.
International monitors on Monday described Ukraine's presidential election as free and fair, putting pressure on Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko to concede defeat despite a tight vote count and charges of irregularities. ... Joao Soares, president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, said the election was an "impressive display of democracy" and called on politicians to honor the outcome.
source screenshot
The Ukrainian election of 2010 was declared fair and according to democratic standards. The other side, which claims to be the "free and democratic" west, was of course not so happy with that outcome. It was not the first time that the Anglo-American power elite orchestrated an illegal regime change in the most undemocratic fashion. The world upside down. Surprise, surprise.
From Yanukovich to Poroshenko
The western power elite and their mass media highlighted the corruption of Viktor Yanukovych in an attempt to seemingly justify their illegal coup. See for example BBC's article 'Ukraine's ousted President Viktor Yanukovych'. Without doubt he was corrupt. But this was already known when the western power elite were all too happy to make some big deals with him related to energy security. See Royal Dutch Shell shale gas deal and Chevron Shell shale gas deal. Western media didn't highlight his corruption back then. They didn't mention that the Euromaidan protests were heavily sponsored by the west. Nor that the west ousted a democratically elected leader. So ousted president Viktor Yanukovych was corrupt. But what about the pro-American puppet installed by the west...
Nearly two years after Yanukovych left power, however, little has been done to bring the perpetrators of violence to justice. President Petro Poroshenko has not demonstrated the political will needed to fight Ukraine's oligarchs and high levels of corruption. Poroshenko, it seems, like his predecessors, may fail to bring justice, respect, and humanity that Ukrainians demanded in the revolutions in 2004 and 2013—2014. Not surprisingly, many Ukrainians are skeptical of Poroshenko's intentions. Poroshenko is unpopular in just about every region of Ukraine: a recent poll showed that only 17 percent of participating Ukrainians support him. These anemic poll numbers give the president less support than Yanukovych had when he was ousted from power.
Newspaper The Guardian said that newly installed Petro Poroshenko set up a secret offshore company in the British Virgin Islands at a time when his troops were being wiped out in a bloody battle with Russian troops and pro-Moscow rebels. While his people were dying in fierce battle in Eastern Ukraine pro-American puppet leader Petro Poroshenko made sure much money went straight into his own pockets while dodging taxes in Anglo-American tax havens. Another clever win-win for the western power elite, and a loose-loose for the Ukrainian and European taxpayers. Since the western-backed coup there's a 15% increase in crime in 2016 over 2015 statistics in Kiev according to the Ukraine 2017 Crime & Safety Report of OSAC.
The Crimean operation was a response to the threat of NATO's further expansion along Russia's western border. By this logic, Putin seized the peninsula to prevent two dangerous possibilities: first, that Ukraine's new government might join NATO, and second, that Kiev might evict Russia's Black Sea Fleet from its long-standing base in Sevastopol. ... Putin's seizure of Crimea appears to have been an improvised gambit, developed under pressure, that was triggered by the fear of losing Russia's strategically important naval base in Sevastopol.
Another great propaganda achievement of the western elite is the fact that they succeeded in making the ignorant sheeple in the west believe that the secession of Crimea was an aggressive imperial strategy of Putin's Russia while NATO had been militarily expanding and threatening Russia since the early 1990s after the Soviet Union ended. On 18 March 2014 Crimea secessed from Ukraine and moved back to the protection of Russia. This was a reaction to the illegal western-backed coup and the escalating war in Eastern Ukraine. The western elite systematically misrepresented Crimea and all the events leading up to its secession. Western media gave the impression that everything was Putin's fault. Western logic goes like this: the West is good and Putin is evil. Historically Crimea belonged to the Russian Empire from 1783 to 1917 and to the Soviet Union from 1921 to 1991. In 1956 the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic transferred Crimea to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic as a "gift", while remaining in the Soviet sphere of influence. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union NATO illegally expanded towards the Russian border. Russia rightly protested against this but was ignored by hypocritical western leaders. The Ukrainian crisis was a step too far. So it is no more than understandable that Russia claimed back what historically belonged to Russia while Ukraine moved towards the Anglo-American Empire flirting with EU and NATO membership. Imagine NATO missile systems in Ukraine which of course can be pointed towards Russia in a matter of moments.
Russia's important Black Sea Fleet is located in Sevastopol, Crimea. Anybody who thinks that Russia is going to let the United States get away with an illegal coup, adding Ukraine to NATO, and eventually the overtaking of Russia's Black Sea Fleet is of course a complete idiot. When the United States has the right to protect its own interests overseas then Russia certainly has the right to protect its own interests nextdoor. The Black Sea Fleet is crucial to Russia's protection against the United States and NATO which are known to have been involved in many aggressive wars in the past decades which were obviously related to power, not love. As expected from these hypocrites, the U.S., the United Nations, the European Union and the rest of the anti-Russian western world cried out that the annexation was illegal.
The western elite didn't care for the opinion of the Crimean people themselves as was expected from these undemocratic elite. Western media kept silent about the Crimean people simply because that picture didn't fit with the narrative of the west. The Crimean people are not stupid, they didn't want to undergo the same fate as Eastern Ukraine, being bombed by Kiev. As Allen Edward Buchanan states: according to Associative Group Theories, what confers the right to secede on a group is the voluntary choice of members of the group to form an independent state. Christian Marxsen said that the Crimean population's demand to accede to Russia is — as a matter of politics not law — not unjustified, given the apparent majority opinion there. Crimea is a bastion of support for ousted President Yanukovych. A map of the demographics of Crimea speaks for itself as Crimea is overwhelmingly populated by ethnic Russians. Everywhere in Crimea people were celebrating after the polls were closed and their desired fate was sealed. Anybody who knows the history leading up to this point understands why these people were celebrating. Freed from the western-backed and anti-Russian government that was bombing ethnic Russians in Eastern Ukraine, a fate which no morally sentient human being could possibly wish for Crimeans as well.
Odessa Massacre
On 2 May 2014 anti-Russian neo-Nazis supported by the west slaughtered a group of pro-Russian protesters, the Odessa Massacre. Many western media whores maliciously tried to put the blame on the people who were brutally killed that horrible day, simply because they were pro-Russian and needed to be displayed as the evil ones. Here are some facts mainly left out of the story by western media...
In this video Andriy Parubiy was seen on April 29 2014 delivering military-grade bullet-proof vests to Mykola Volkov, a key participant in the Odessa Trade Union House massacre three days later as will be shown later. Andriy Parubiy is one of the neo-Nazis supported by United States and European Union leaders. He led the Euromaidan protests. He is linked to the coup overthrowing the democratically elected pro-Russian government. The western power elite are in business with these types. Mykola Volkov is known as a local hard-core criminal.
In this photo we see police deputy commander Dmitry Fucheji overseeing shootings by masked gunmen, wearing St. George ribbons, that would provoke a violent reaction. The Guardian reported that there are claims of complicity between police and activists across the divide. The Oriental Review reported that Available photos reveal that these attackers enjoyed at least neutrality of the local police, while some others evidence that their actions were coordinated by people in police uniform. One of the identified coordinators was deputy chief of the Odessa Interior ministry branch Colonel Dmitry Fucheji.
The Ukrainian police oversaw the shootings, allegedly by pro-Russian protesters because of their St.George ribbons, that provoked violence against pro-Russian protesters. In the first picture you see police deputy commander Dmitry Fucheji as he is overseeing a shooting. In the second picture you see a police officer instructing a group of people wearing red bands around their arms. Red is of course the color of Russia. On the left you see a Ukrainian nationalist with Ukrainian flags on his bullet-proof jacket, but also with a red band around his arm. That's suspicious. Possibly these people were supposed to give the impression that pro-Russian protestors were stirring up violence. Like a false flag tactic. So some police officers might have played the role of agent provocateur that day, a more and more common phenomenon used by the power elite in the west in order to steer protests in their favor.
Pro-Kiev supporters and neo-Nazis burned the tent camp of pro-Russian protesters in front of the Trade Unions Building. An eyewitness told a BBC reporter that tents in the pro-Russian camp were burning when he arrived and those there had moved to the entrance of the nearby Trade Unions House. Eventually, they were driven in. The Telegraph reported that The pro-Russians tried to make a last stand on the steps of the House of Trade Unions, throwing up barricades around the great stone pillars in front of the doors. Finally, they were forced to retreat inside. The pro-Russian protesters were driven into the building by the violent pro-Kiev supporters and neo-Nazis.
Ukrainian fascist girls, supporters of a 'Single Ukraine', prepared Molotov cocktails...
Pro-Kiev supporters and neo-Nazis threw Molotov cocktails at the Trade Unions Building with the pro-Russian protesters inside, setting the building on fire. Those outside chanted "burn Colorado, burn," witnesses said. Swastikalike symbols were spray painted on the building.
In this video we see police deputy commander Dmitry Fucheji again (19m01s). He doesn't seem to "control" the situation and he doesn't seem to make much effort to get the situation under control. Unfortunately I don't understand the language they speak. Now check one of the following links of a man shooting at trapped pro-Russian Ukrainians while fabricating lies on the phone: YouTube/#. The man phoning and shooting at people who are trying to escape the flames is Mykola Volkov, the local hard-core criminal. The people inside are screaming towards their deaths as wicked neo-Nazis and pro-Kiev supporters slaughter them one by one as would later be revealed. The Irish Times described it as follows: Shouts of anger have become screams of panic and soon people are falling from windows and jumping to escape the inferno; prone on the concrete, some move a little. Most do not. Also note that Mykola Volkov is wearing a bullet-proof vest while obviously nobody is shooting back. What a hero. That bullet-proof vest he obtained from Andriy Parubiy, a key neo-Nazi behind the Euromaidan protests, who got them from the west. Here are some photos of the massacre that day...
Around 50 mostly defenseless people murdered and burned to death inside this building by a neo-Nazi mob supported by the western elite. The woman who is lying on the desk was later confirmed to be an employee who worked in this building. People tortured, mutilated and burned to a horrible death. See Ersieesist - How the thugs killed Odessa inhabitants in the Trade Unions House - the details of bloody scenario for more photos and information. Here's an example of what western media made of that horrible day...
Who were the gunmen in the city centre on Friday afternoon? Were they among the people who later entered the building and were shooting from there? Where did the Molotov cocktails come from? How did the fire start? Why did the pro-Russian crowd rush into a building instead of running away? Why could the 40 people not escape once the building caught fire? These are some of the unanswered questions now tormenting Odessa.
Here's a comment from a reader...
Another disgusting piece in the western media about the Odessa massacre. People were trapped in the building which was petrol bombed by an angry mob. Those that tried to escape were shot and beaten. Anyone with access to the internet can see that. But instead of tell the truth the Economist, along with other media outlets, are denying the facts and spouting conspiracy theories to cover up a bloody massacre committed by the neo-nazis they back.
source screenshot
The facts are known and obvious. The neo-Nazis were supported by the western power elite and their media tried to cover it up and even put the blame on Putin and Russia. Business as usual.
Russia is now fighting against Ukraine, in Ukraine. Russian troops and Russian tanks are attacking the Ukrainian forces. And while talking about peace, Russia has not made one single step to make peace possible. Instead of de-escalating the crisis, Russia has only deepened it.
NATO is the war machine of the west led by the United States. Of course its leaders ignore much of reality and present a premeditated anti-Russian narrative to further their agenda which is all about power.
The German government is alarmed. Are the Americans trying to thwart European efforts at mediation led by Chancellor Angela Merkel? Sources in the Chancellery have referred to Breedlove's comments as "dangerous propaganda." Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier even found it necessary recently to bring up Breedlove's comments with NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg.
source screenshot
Even German mainstream magazine the Spiegel mentioned the gross exaggerations and warmongering lies of NATO. Some facts these hypocrites always forget to mention is that NATO has been illegally expanding its military machine towards the Russian border. NATO is heavily involved in this Ukrainian crisis while its western friends have been backing the Euromaidan revolution, the neo-Nazis and the illegal coup. After all, NATO is the war machine of the Anglo-American power elite. And what about the EU? Fuck the EU.