On 27 April 1961 John F. Kennedy speeched...

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President... I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy. The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies... In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined... to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.*

Like many US presidents, Kennedy used "national security" to allow for more secrecy in his government and he wanted the media to better work together with the government. During the Cold War the threat of communism was used as an excuse for their secrecy. During the Vietnam War media coverage was very biased and in favor of their desired war. Because of secrecy the American power elite could let the Vietnam War go on and the American public was held in the dark about its disastrous consequences for such a long time. Both the government and the media are controlled by the power elite. The famous "clear and present danger" can be created or exaggerated at will by the power elite. A good example is the Gulf of Tonkin false flag which was used by president Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy's successor, as justification to scale up US involvement in the Vietnam War.

With the wide secrecy covering their operations and decisions, the power elite can mask their intentions, operations, and further consolidation. And secrecy that is imposed upon those in positions to observe high decision-makers clearly works for and not against the operations of the power elite.

On 2 November 1963 South Vietnamese US puppet president Ngo Dinh Diem was assassinated with help of the CIA. A little later on 22 November 1963 John F. Kennedy was assassinated. Now it is known that John F. Kennedy had formally decided to withdraw from Vietnam ... and ... the assassinations of Diem and then of JFK prolonged a war that otherwise might have ended quietly within a few years.*

As is common with these kind of events a lone nut, Lee Harvey Oswald*, was accused of the crime despite there being plenty motives for powerful elite to get rid of JFK at that time* and despite the fact that plenty of key people mysteriously died afterwards.* See also Will Fox's Doubt and Deception: Public Opinion of the Warren Report * and Gerald D. McKnight's Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why **. Some interesting angles to this story which were obscured by the media are those of George Joannides* and that of James Jesus Angleton*, chief of CIA Counterintelligence from 1954 to 1975. During his career he had ties with Italian mafia and was protected by CIA Directors Allen W. Dulles and successor John A. McCone.

The Warren Commission "investigating" the assassination was led by seven people of which one was Allen W. Dulles, the CIA director who was fired by Kennedy in 1961 over the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Dulles was director of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1927 and he was also a Knight of Malta for the powerful Catholic Church. His brother John Foster Dulles was Secretary of State under Eisenhower. Both represented the extremely corrupt United Fruit Company in law suits with their powerful law firm Sullivan & Cromwell.

In 1967 the CIA produced an initially secret document called Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report. It was released in 1977 as the result of a request under the Freedom of Information Act for access to Lee Harvey Oswald’s CIA file. It proposed...

To employ propaganda assets to answer and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. ... Our play should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (i) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (ii) politically interested, (iii) financially interested, (iv) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (v) infatuated with their own theories.

Another member of the Warren Commission was John J. McCloy who at that time was chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank owned by the very powerful Rockefeller family. He was also chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. Of course the Rockefeller Commission supported the conclusion of the Warren Commission. Birds of a feather flock together.

The US president was killed in broad daylight, evidence destroyed, a patsy was accused of the crime and then killed, many other witnesses died mysteriously, the mass media didn't ask any critical questions, they used propaganda to counter any criticism, and an official US government commission included suspects with links to mafia who benefited from the crime.

In this picture the mythological figure Atlas is holding the celestial heavens at the Rockefeller Center in Manhattan, New York City. Atlas was said to have been skilled in philosophy, mathematics, and astronomy. In other words, he was skilled in knowledge. For example the word "Atlanticism" is derived from this mythical god and this Atlanticism played a crucial role in the maintainance and expansion of power of the Anglo-American and European elite, especially since WWII.

These elite are known for their more or less secret societies which are clubs or organizations whose activities, events, and inner functioning are concealed from non-members. They openly promote globalization by which they take away sovereignty of nations with time. They openly speech for a world government. Much of what they discuss remains behind closed doors and they operate through a variety of organizations and so-called think tanks and NGO's that are presented to the world as independent while in reality they present information in line with the agenda of the power elite by whom they are funded.

Let's check some known organizations which are used by the power elite to further their agenda by influencing domestic and foreign policy of the United States and other governments in the world...

The Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries.* and takes no institutional position on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. government. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion contained in its publications are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.

In the late 1930s, the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation began contributing large amounts of money to the Council. In 1938 they created various Committees on Foreign Relations, which later became governed by the American Committees on Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., throughout the country, funded by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation. Influential men were to be chosen in a number of cities, and would then be brought together for discussions in their own communities as well as participating in an annual conference in New York. These local committees served to influence local leaders and shape public opinion to build support for the Council's policies, while also acting as "useful listening posts" through which the Council and U.S. government could "sense the mood of the country". ... The secrecy surrounding this group was such, that the Council members who were not involved in its deliberations were completely unaware of the study group's existence.*

The Council on Foreign Relations, or CFR, largely determines the foreign policy of the United States. It was founded by very powerful people. While it is not affiliated with any political party, it is of course affiliated with the ideas and beliefs of the power elite in control of it. It is involved in powerful media and propaganda around the world to the benefit of its ultra-rich owners. It is strongly influenced by the Ford family, the Rockefeller family and Andrew Carnegie, some of the richest people on earth. The Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Corporation are some of the tools by which these ultra-rich exert influence. See also Foundations of the American Century in the Rise of American Power. C. Wright Mills said the following about these kind of foundations...

A foundation is defined as 'any autonomous, non-profit legal entity that is set up to "serve the wellfare of mankind." ... the setting up of foundations has often become a convenient way of avoiding taxes, 'operating as private banks for their donors; not infrequently, the "mankind" they have served turned out to be a few indigent relatives.

James Paul Warburg was a powerful banker, a financial adviser to Franklin D. Roosevelt, and the first director of the Council on Foreign Relations. He was the son of Paul Warburg who is known as the father of the Federal Reserve system and prominent member of the powerful Warburg family. In 1950 he said...

We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.*

I have been often to I guess the mother ship in New York City, but it's good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won't have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.*

The annual Bilderberg Meeting has been a forum for informal discussions to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, approx. 130 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, labour, academia and the media are invited... The meeting is a forum for informal discussions about major issues. The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor of any other participant may be revealed. Thanks to the private nature of the meeting, the participants take part as individuals rather than in any official capacity, and hence are not bound by the conventions of their office or by pre-agreed positions. ... There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.*

The Bilderberg meetings are attended by some of the world's most influential people. Secrecy is key to their meetings as stated by themselves. Secrecy is the opposite of transparency and it is anti-democratic by definition when it comes to governance. Taxpayer money is used to provide extreme security measures for these meetings*. Media and political figures are invited to get instructed with so-called scientifically and intellectually sounding talk from policy advisers of think thanks and NGO's which are created and sponsored by the ultra-rich.

The first conference ... was initiated by several people, including Polish politician-in-exile Józef Retinger, concerned about the growth of anti-Americanism in Western Europe, who proposed an international conference at which leaders from European countries and the United States would be brought together with the aim of promoting Atlanticism—better understanding between the cultures of the United States and Western Europe to foster cooperation on political, economic, and defense issues. Retinger approached Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands who agreed to promote the idea, together with former Belgian prime minister Paul van Zeeland, and the then head of Unilever, Dutchman Paul Rijkens. Bernhard in turn contacted Walter Bedell Smith, then head of the CIA, who asked Eisenhower adviser Charles Douglas Jackson to deal with the suggestion.*

Charles Douglas Jackson was an expert in propaganda and psychological warfare. Atlanticism is part of the major post-WWII propaganda campaign in Western Europe which is part of Americanization of the world. It is an important component of the Anglo-American Empire which once more understates that Western Europe, and later the European Union, are not independent of it. The Marshall Plan was of course not a free gift but it was quid pro quo and return on investment was expected. It meant that Western Europe had to Americanize. This is also understated by the American military bases and NATO, the military alliance led by the United States.

The first Bilderberg meeting was hosted by globalist Prince Bernhard in 1954. He was married to the queen of the Netherlands and an influential man with influential friends.

Bernhard studied Law at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland and in Berlin, where he acquired a taste for fast cars, horse riding, and big-game hunting safaris. ... While at university, Bernhard joined the Nazi Party. He also enrolled in the Sturmabteilung (SA), which he left in 1934 when he graduated. The Prince later denied that he had belonged to SA, to the Reiter-SS (SS Cavalry Corps), and to the NSKK, but these are well-documented memberships. ... he was not a fierce champion of democracy ... The Prince eventually went to work for the German chemical giant IG Farben...*

He was a Nazi SS member who helped Nazis escape to Argentina while he was the director of Dutch airline KLM* While having been the first president of the WWF in 1961 he was a big fan of big-game hunting safaris.* Later in life he held an important position at IG Farben, known for having been an important sponsor of Hitler's rise to power. And then there was the Lockheed Scandal* which he always denied. A professional liar. He was not a fan of democracy which understates his plans for globalization and thus also for the dismantling of nation states by taking away their sovereignty.

In the photo Prince Bernhard and queen Juliana receive Suharto and his wife on 3 September 1970. Suharto was the dictator of Indonesia from 1967 to 1998 who was supported by the west because of his staunch anti-communism, among other things. He was known as a war criminal* and one of the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century*. Indonesia is linked to the Netherlands because of the imperial colonial period. A good example to further examine in this context is Western New Guinea...

In 1936 Dutch explorer-geologist Jean Jaques Dozy discovered the presence of abundant copper ore in a mountain he called "Ertsberg" in Western New Guinea (or Papua) which later would become known as the Grasberg mine, the world's largest copper and gold mine. His discovery was recounted in a paper which was promptly ignored.
In 1949 Indonesia became independent. Until that time the Dutch East Indies belonged to the Dutch Empire. Sukarno was the leader of the Indonesian struggle for independence. However, the Dutch retained sovereignty over Western New Guinea.

In 1959 Forbes Wilson, exploration chief for Freeport Sulphur Co., learned of Ertsberg from Dozy's report. In 1960 he visited Ertsberg which proved to be the world's largest above-ground outcrop of copper, with indications of a much larger mineral district.​ In 1960 the Dutch explained the situation of Western New Guinea to president Kennedy and warned for possible Indonesian military intervention.* They also mentioned that Western New Guinea had always been separate from Indonesia, being different races of peoples. So already in 1960 there was a conflict between Indonesia and the Papuan people who wanted independence. In 1961 Sukarno asked president Kennedy for support in adding Western New Guinea (West Irian) to Indonesia.* He made clear to Kennedy that he wanted Indonesia to be independent of foreign powers. Also with the intent on nationalisation of foreign industries. Kennedy was reluctant.

In 1962 the power elite overpowered the Dutch under pressure from the Kennedy administration. On 15 August 1962 the United Nations granted temporary authority to itself over Western New Guinea with the New York Agreement and in 1963 it granted authority to Indonesia. Since that time the Papua conflict intensified in Western New Guinea between Indonesia and the Free Papua Movement which was very underreported in the West. At the same time there was a struggle between Sukarno's Indonesia and British controlled Malaysia. The relation between Sukarno and the US deteriorated and he even withdrew Indonesia from the United Nations on 7 January 1965 when Malaysia took a seat on the UN Security Council with US backing. Sukarno flirted with Soviet power and became more unpopular in the West and had to be removed...

In 1967 the CIA-backed coup took place. It is no secret that the CIA was involved in the assassination of Sukarno who was accused of not being anti-communist enough. The CIA supported general Suharto who would become the cruel dictator of Indonesia, but friendly to the United States. Before the coup took place there was a period of chaos in Indonesia with bloody massacres of anything pro-communist, supported by the CIA. A top-secret CIA report from 1968 was released in 2007 and stated that the massacres rank as one of the worst mass murders of the 20th century*. Of course the Rockefeller Commission investigating the CIA in 1975 would never publish any evidence about CIA involvement that would cause public outrage and attempted to whitewash the episode. After taking office Suharto started so-called de-Sukarnoization in an attempt to rewrite history in his favor, just like the power elite tried in the West.

In 1967, directly after Suharto became president, Freeport McMoRan became the first company to sign a contract under Indonesia's new foreign investment law* to exploit the world's largest copper mine and second largest gold mine: Grasberg mine in Western New Guinea. Since that time Freeport McMoRan is known for exploitation, cronyism, and environmental devastation* in Papua. The people involved in Freeport McMoRan were Gerald J. Ford, Henry Kissinger, Godfrey Stillman Rockefeller, and other rich business men.

In 1968 the US embassy in Indonesia reported to Washington...

Following the removal of Sukarno, our bilateral relations with Indonesia improved markedly. During 1967, American owned businesses, previously taken over under the Sukarno regime, were returned to their original owners, and several American firms, taking advantage of the present government’s liberal economic policies, concluded agreements for new investments in Indonesia. ... As a result of these and other factors, the US has become closely identified with the goals and efforts of the Suharto government. Such an identification is in fact inevitable since we have a heavy stake in the success of the “New Order” not only for obvious reasons related to Indonesia’s size, strategic importance, resources and potential strength but also because it is the latest test case of whether liberal economic policies combined with free world assistance offer a more solid path to modernization than communism or other totalitarian solutions.*

Suharto violently repressed any political dissent by Papuan people who demanded independence for Western New Guinea. According to rights activists: More than 500,000 Papuans have been killed, and thousands more have been raped, tortured and imprisoned by the Indonesian military since 1969.*

President Nixon, who later resigned in 1974 due to the Watergate scandal, and national security adviser Henry Kissinger visited Jakarta in July 1969. Kissinger would later become board member of Freeport McMoRan from 1995 to 2001. He was one of the most frequent participants of the Bilderberg conference*.

Nixon's declassified briefing papers* reveal that Kissinger gave the president the following advice...

Points to avoid: the West Irian "act of free choice" will be underway during your visit. It consists of a series of consultations, rather than a direct election, which would be almost meaningless among the stone age cultures of New Guinea. There is a UN observer on the scene, and we assume that U Thant will go along with the Indonesian form of the act of free choice. There is, however, a small but active West Papuan independence movement, and a variety of groups in Australia and the Netherlands which take exception to the Indonesian technique of self-determination. Because the U.S. played a mediating role in resolving the Indonesian/Dutch controversy over the future of West Irian, there may be a tendency to associate you with the form in which the act of free choice is being conducted. We should avoid any U.S. identification with that act.

On 2 August 1969, the Indonesian government held what it called the ‘Act of Free Choice’ in West Papua. Indonesia marched 1026 Papuan tribal representatives (Out of 800,000 people) to the voting booths; some by gunpoint, and some having to leave their wives and children in the ‘care of the Indonesian government’. These 1026 Papuans were asked to choose to remain with Indonesia or become independent. Every single person raised their hands and cheered for Indonesia.*

Over six weeks from July to August 1969, U.N. officials conducted the so-called "Act of Free Choice." Under the articles of the New York Agreement (Article 18) all adult Papuans had the right to participate in an act of self-determination to be carried out in accordance with international practice. ... Despite significant evidence that Indonesia had failed to meet its international obligations, in November 1969 the United Nations "took note" of the "Act of Free Choice" and its results, thereby lending support of the world body to Indonesia's annexation.*

See Act of Free Choice*. Thus western-backed Indonesian dictator Suharto gained complete rule through a United Nations-sanctioned but discredited ballot in 1969 which was a gross violation of human rights and democracy. See also John Saltford's UN Involvement with the Act of Self Determination in West Irian 1968 to 1969 * and The United Nations, West Papua and the Act of Free Choice: de-colonisation in action?.

In 2020, after more than half century of human rights abuses, genocide and looting of West Papua*, the United Nations came with the following statement...

source

Extraordinary. Could it be that the United Nations is a tool to further the agenda of the globalist elite, contrary to its beautiful and appealing statements about human rights? Yes! And Papua is a very good example of it.

How many aggressive wars fought by the Anglo-American elite did the UN prevent? None! The power elite in the West, including the United Nations, were heavily involved in the bloody chaos in Indonesia, the bloody coup, and support for a cruel dictator's bloody puppet regime. All of this was done to make profit of Indonesia's resources. The United Nations is not an organization in favor of the common people, but first of all in favor of the ultra-rich and their industries. And that's of course in line with how power works in the real world.

In the photo Prince Bernhard hands over the Erasmus Prize to Alexander King who co-founded the Club of Rome with Aurelio Peccei who was an Italian industrialist and another one of the many so-called "philanthropists", super-rich people who want to "save mankind and the world from poverty and disaster". What a contradiction! According to the people in control of the Club of Rome they shared a "profound concern for the long-term future of humanity and the planet"*. The Club of Rome is another instrument of the Anglo-American power elite.

It presents itself as a "leading think tank at world level". Organizations like the Club of Rome provide the power elite with the necessary ammunition in the form of reports like for example The Limits to Growth which talks about world population and of course overpopulation supported by carefully twisting and bending science in their own favor. For example Paul R. Ehrlich, linked to the Club of Rome, wrote...

A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people... We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions. The pain may be intense. But the disease is so far advanced that only with radical surgery does the patient have a chance of survival.*

Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, also linked to the Club of Rome, wrote...

In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.

The title of the paragraph from which this quote is taken reads The common enemy of humanity is Man and it's followed by the chapter The Human Malaise. They try to make you believe that you are the problem, but of course humanity itself is not the real enemy. The people who installed and now maintain the system based on materialism are the root cause of trouble. And those are the power elite themselves who benefit from duping and milking taxpayers. They present a twisted view of the world in which they try to distract the people from the real source of the problems. On page 7 of their book these elite write...

Humanity will have to be forever on guard against the rise of insane leaders with great charisma, capable of hypnotizing whole nations, and willing to destroy the world rather than go down in defeat.

Sounds like a good description of themselves.

we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we'd like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need [Scientists should consider stretching the truth] to get some broadbased support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This 'double ethical bind' we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.*

The people in control of such organizations use the media for indoctrination and propaganda. As opposed to what he claims, true science never promotes to "consider stretching the truth", it should be unbiased. Their "science" is highly politicized and therefore biased. The political elite have to sell these twisted ideas to the taxpayers and by putting the label "science" on them it's easier to mislead ignorant taxpayers. The elite at the Club of Rome are to a large extent responsible for the global climate change propaganda which is meant to extract more taxes from taxpayers.

The slogan of the World Economic Forum, or WEF, is Committed to improving the state of the world*. But for whom? Klaus Schwab, the frontman of the WEF, gives a strong hint in his book COVID-19: The Great Reset...

One of the great lessons of the past five centuries in Europe and America is this: acute crises contribute to boosting the power of the state. It’s always been the case and there is no reason why it should be different with the COVID-19 pandemic.

The power elite are committed to boosting the power of the "state of the world" in which they will rule of course. COVID-1984 is a good example of an event which shifted much power from people to these globalist elite.

The goal of the globalist elite is global governance. A world government represents an all-powerful government and is typically administered by a single, centralized Big Government in control of everything and everybody.

In this picture on the left Henry Kissinger with Klaus Schwab and former UK PM Edward Heath in Davos in 1980 at an early World Economic Forum meeting. In 2014 Kissinger wrote a book called World Order which is about how to build a shared international order in a world of divergent historical perspectives, violent conflict, proliferating technology, and ideological extremism. Some quotes by Kissinger...

Let us fashion together a New World Order.
The world is in chaos. Fundamental upheavals are occurring in many parts of the world simultaneously, most of which are governed by disparate principles. We are therefore faced with two problems: first, how to reduce regional chaos; second, how to create a coherent world order based on agreed-upon principles that are necessary for the operation of the entire system.*

He is one of the key architects of the Anglo-American Empire and a close friend of the Rockefellers*, one of the richest families on earth with tremendous power.

Some of WEF's leading members* are: Jim Yong Kim, president of the World Bank. Christine Lagarde, managing director, International Monetary Fund. Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England. Katherine Garrett-Cox, member of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG. Al Gore, the fanatic global warming clown.* Herman Gref, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Executive Board, Sberbank. Luis Alberto Moreno, President, The Inter-American Development Bank. Min Zhu, Deputy Managing Director, International Monetary Fund.
Besides representatives of those financial institutions it has representatives of the world's leading industrial corporations. These people represent the banking world, IMF and the Worldbank and of course the world's largest and most powerful corporations whose elite leaders all have personal interests and share the same ideas. Samuel Huntington described them as...

An elite group of highly educated people who operate in the rarefied domains of international finance, media, and diplomacy... [who] share common beliefs about individualism, democracy, and market economics.*

In 2017 the frontman of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, stated...

I have to say that when I mention our names as Mrs. Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on. They all have been Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of right now is the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, the President of Argentina and so on, that we penetrate the cabinets. Yesterday, I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I knew that half of his cabinet or even more than half of his cabinet is from the World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders.** *

In November 2019 he said to Putin:

Our goal, as you already mentioned, is to strengthen cooperation between business people and government agencies. We are convinced that the significant challenges that we face today, be it climate and environmental problems or problems of economic growth, can only be solved through cooperation, specifically at the global level.*

The WEF raises Young Global Leaders around the world in order to lead the nations and control world events.

The Trilateral Commission is a global membership organization that for decades has brought together senior policymakers, business leaders, and representatives of media and academe to discuss and propose solutions to some of the world’s toughest problems. Founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller, the Commission has long been an important venue to incubate ideas and form relationships across sectors and geographies.*

Also this organization is about Atlanticism and Americanization. The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller. In the photo a Trilateral Commission meeting with President Gerald Ford in 1974. To Ford's left David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, a very influential foreign policy advisor to the United States who co-founded the Trilateral Commission. These councils are all about power and globalization.

In this photo US president Gerald Ford and Henry Kissinger meet with Indonesian president Suharto and vice president Adam Malik on 6 December 1975 in Jakarta, Indonesia. Adam Malik was President of the United Nations General Assembly in 1971. Ford and Kissinger gave their approval* for the Indonesian occupation of East Timor in 1975 that left perhaps 200,000 dead in the years since.* Suharto, as mentioned earlier in this chapter, is known for being a war criminal* and one of the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century*.

Ironically, Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 by his fellow globalist friends for "having negotiated a cease fire in Vietnam in 1973". See Vietnam War.

The Rockefeller family is an American industrial, political, and banking family that made one of the world's largest fortunes in the oil business during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with John D. Rockefeller and his brother William Rockefeller primarily through Standard Oil. The family is also known for its long association with and control of Chase Manhattan Bank. They are considered to be one of the most powerful families, if not the most powerful family, in the history of the United States.

The Rockefeller Foundation presents itself as a "promoter of the well-being of humanity around the world". But really? The Rockefeller Foundation was started by Standard Oil owner John D. Rockefeller who played a major role in the rise of Hitler and fascism in Germany. Or what about the killing of his own working people who protested for better rights and a better life instead of the inhumane working conditions imposed by Rockefeller? In 1910 the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey guilty of monopolizing the petroleum industry through a series of abusive and anticompetitive actions*.

In his Memoirs David Rockefeller wrote...

Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

David Rockefeller is founder of the earlier mentioned Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission which have much influence on the foreign policy of the United States and its allies, and thus on world events. In the picture he sits with Lord Jacob Rothschild who belongs to one of the world's most wealthy and powerful families. The Rothschild family is an international banking family known for having established European wide banking in 1800 *. In the 19th century they lent money to Kings and governments and funded both sides in the Napoleonic wars. They once saved the Bank of England from collapse with their own money.*

Let us control the money of a country and we care not who makes its laws." This the maxim of the House of Rothschilds, and it is the foundation principle of European banks. If a country and its people are mortgaged for the assessed value of their property, and the bankers control the money, the bondholders and not the people own that country. It makes no difference whether you call it a republic or a monarchy. The people can never be free "as the borrower is the servant of the lender.

We don't know how rich the world's wealthiest families really are. That says enough. The Rockefellers and Rothschilds are not mentioned in Forbes' The World's Billionaires * or Business Insider's 50 richest people on earth. Maybe because they belong to the category trillionaires. These people control the media and have the power to stay behind the scenes while the billionaires are highlighted. They undoubtedly control much of world events to their own benefit via their many NGO's, think tanks, so-called "philanthropical" organizations and connections. It includes of course also the world's monarchies like for example the British Royal family and the Dutch Royal family of which Prince Bernhard was a member. To know which people really rule this world we have to follow the money. To be rich the rest has to be relatively poor. Inequality has spiraled completely out of proportion in the last decades and that is surely no accident.

The course of events in our time depends more on a series of human decisions than on any inevitable fate. ... As the circle of those who decide is narrowed, as the means of decision are centralized and the consequences of decisions become enormous, then the course of great events often rests upon the decisions of determinable circles.

source

The Rockefeller File is a book by Gary Allen who is displayed by mainstream media as a "conspiracy theorist" for believing that "international banking and politics control domestic decisions, taking them out of elected officials' hands"*. Larry McDonald wrote in its introduction...

The Rockefeller File is not fiction. It is a compact, powerful and frightening presentation of what may be the most important story of our lifetime, the drive of the Rockefellers and their allies to create a one world government, combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control. For more than one hundred years, since the days when John D. Rockefeller Sr. used every devious strategy he could devise to create a gigantic oil monopoly, enough books have been written about the Rockefellers to fill a library. I have read many of them. And to my knowledge, not one has dared reveal the most vital part of the Rockefeller story: that the Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do.*