From JFK to Rockefeller
This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy. The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies... In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined... to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.
Like many U.S. presidents, John F. Kennedy used "national security" to allow for more secrecy in his government and he wanted the media to better work together with the government. During the Cold War they used the threat of communism. During the Vietnam War media coverage was very biased and in favor of their desired war. Because of secrecy the American power elite could let the Vietnam War go on and the American public was held in the dark about its disastrous consequences for such a long time. In 1956 C. Wright Mills wrote thatWith the wide secrecy covering their operations and decisions, the power elite can mask their intentions, operations, and further consolidation. And secrecy that is imposed upon those in positions to observe high decision-makers clearly works for and not against the operations of the power elite. The famous "clear and present danger" can be created or exaggerated at will by the power elite. A good example is the Gulf of Tonkin false flag which was used by President Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy's successor, as justification to scale up US involvement in the Vietnam War. On 2 November 1963 South Vietnamese U.S. puppet president Ngo Dinh Diem was assassinated with help of the CIA. A little later on 22 November 1963 John F. Kennedy was assassinated.
As is common with these kind of events a "lone nut", a patsy, was accused of the crime despite there being plenty motives for powerful elite to get rid of JFK at that time * and despite the fact that plenty of key people mysteriously died afterwards *. See also Will Fox's Doubt and Deception: Public Opinion of the Warren Report * and Gerald D. McKnight's Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why *. The fact alone that these things were waved away by establishment and the media as "crazy conspiracy theories" gives more credence to a conspiracy and makes the "lone nut" theory more incredible. Some interesting angles to this story which were obscured by the media are those of George Joannides and that of James Jesus Angleton, chief of CIA Counterintelligence from 1954 to 1975. During his career he had ties with Italian mafia and was protected by CIA Directors Allen W. Dulles and successor John A. McCone. It was James Jesus Angleton who once said thatdeception is a state of mind and the mind of the State.
The Warren Commission "investigating" the assassination was led by seven people of which one was Allen W. Dulles, the CIA director who was fired by Kennedy in 1961 over the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Dulles was director of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1927 and he was also a Knight of Malta for the powerful Catholic Church. His brother John Foster Dulles was Secretary of State under Eisenhower. Both represented the extremely corrupt United Fruit Company in law suits with their powerful law firm Sullivan & Cromwell. Another member of the Warren Commission was John J. McCloy who at that time was chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank owned by the very powerful Rockefeller family mentioned later. He was also chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations which will also be mentioned later. Of course the Rockefeller Commission supported the conclusion of the Warren Commission. Birds of a feather flock together. The US president was killed in broad daylight, evidence destroyed, a patsy accused of the crime, the patsy and many witnesses killed, the mass media forced to stop asking any obvious questions, and an official US government commission, including suspects with links to mafia who benefited of the crime, was set up to perpetuate the official lies. That shows tremendous power of the power elite and indescribable stupidity of the people who bought into the incredible official nonsense they were made to believe.
In this picture the mythological figure Atlas is holding the celestial heavens at the Rockefeller Center in Manhattan, New York City. Atlas was said to have been skilled in philosophy, mathematics, and astronomy. In other words, he was skilled in knowledge. For example the word "Atlanticism" is derived from this mythical god and this Atlanticism played a crucial role in the maintainance and expansion of power of the Anglo-American and European elite, especially since WWII. These elite are known for their more or less secret societies which are clubs or organizations whose activities, events, and inner functioning are concealed from non-members. They openly promote globalization by which they take away sovereignty of nations with time. They openly speech for a world government. Much of what they discuss remains behind closed doors and they operate through a variety of organizations and so-called think tanks and NGO's that are presented to the world as independent while in reality they present information in line with the agenda of the power elite by whom they are funded. Let's check some known organizations which are used by the power elite to further their agenda by influencing for example foreign policy of the United States and other governments in the world...
Council on Foreign Relations (1921)
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries.
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) largely determines the foreign policy of the United States. It says about itself that it isan independent, nonpartisan foreign policy think tank and membership organization.While it is not affiliated with any political party, it is of course affiliated with the ideas and beliefs of the power elite in control of it. So when these powerful people determine US foreign policy it also shows they are more powerful than the political spectrum of left and right or republican and democrat. The CFR was founded by powerful people and in the 1930s it definitely came under the control of the richest men in the United States...
In the late 1930s, the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation began contributing large amounts of money to the Council. In 1938 they created various Committees on Foreign Relations, which later became governed by the American Committees on Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., throughout the country, funded by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation. Influential men were to be chosen in a number of cities, and would then be brought together for discussions in their own communities as well as participating in an annual conference in New York. These local committees served to influence local leaders and shape public opinion to build support for the Council's policies, while also acting as "useful listening posts" through which the Council and U.S. government could "sense the mood of the country". ... The secrecy surrounding this group was such, that the Council members who were not involved in its deliberations were completely unaware of the study group's existence.
The CFR aims toinfluence local leaders and shape public opinion to build support for the Council's policies. It is involved in powerful media and propaganda around the world to the benefit of its ultra-rich owners. It is strongly influenced by the Ford family, the Rockefeller family, and Andrew Carnegie, some of the richest people on earth. The Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Corporation are some of the tools by which these ultra-rich exert influence. The Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie Foundations are also called Foundations of the American Century in the Rise of American Power. Already in 1956 C. Wright Mills wrote thata foundation is defined as 'any autonomous, non-profit legal entity that is set up to "serve the wellfare of mankind." ... the setting up of foundations has often become a convenient way of avoiding taxes, 'operating as private banks for their donors; not infrequently, the "mankind" they have served turned out to be a few indigent relatives.James Warburg was a financial adviser to Franklin D. Roosevelt, a powerful banker, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1950 he said:We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.* It just goes to show what these kind of people are after and what their agenda is. James Warburg was the son of Paul Warburg who is known as the "father" of the Federal Reserve system and the first director of the Council on Foreign Relations at its founding in 1921.
In July 2009 Hillary Clinton made clear who runs the show from behind the scenes:I have been often to I guess the mother ship in New York City, but it's good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won't have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.* The political elite serve the power elite.
Bilderberg Group (1954)
...designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, approx. 130 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, labour, academia and the media are invited... The meeting is a forum for informal discussions about major issues. The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor of any other participant may be revealed. Thanks to the private nature of the meeting, the participants take part as individuals rather than in any official capacity, and hence are not bound by the conventions of their office or by pre-agreed positions. ... There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.
Obviously these are the kind of meetings where the power elite talk globalization and plan what's going to happen in the world. Anybody who believes otherwise is severely deluded. It's about power, not about some chitchat. The Bilderberg meetings are attended by some of the world's most influential people. Secrecy is key to their meetings as stated by themselves. Secrecy is the opposite of transparency and it is anti-democratic by definition when it comes to governance. Taxpayer money is used to provide extreme security measures for these meetings *. Media and political figures are invited to get instructed with so-called scientifically and intellectually sounding talk from policy advisers of think thanks and NGO's which are created and sponsored by these power elite themselves.
The first conference ... was initiated by several people, including Polish politician-in-exile Józef Retinger, concerned about the growth of anti-Americanism in Western Europe, who proposed an international conference at which leaders from European countries and the United States would be brought together with the aim of promoting Atlanticism—better understanding between the cultures of the United States and Western Europe to foster cooperation on political, economic, and defense issues. Retinger approached Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands who agreed to promote the idea, together with former Belgian prime minister Paul van Zeeland, and the then head of Unilever, Dutchman Paul Rijkens. Bernhard in turn contacted Walter Bedell Smith, then head of the CIA, who asked Eisenhower adviser Charles Douglas Jackson to deal with the suggestion.
Charles Douglas Jackson was an expert in propaganda and psychological warfare. Atlanticism is part of the major post-WWII propaganda campaign in Western Europe which is part of Americanization of the world. It is an important component of the Anglo-American Empire which once more understates that Western Europe, and later the EU, are not independent of it. The Marshall Plan was of course not a free gift but it was quid pro quo and return on investment was expected. It meant that Western Europe had to Americanize. This is also understated by the American military bases and NATO, the military alliance led by the United States. The first Bilderberg meeting was hosted by globalist Prince Bernhard in 1954, He was married to the queen of the Netherlands. Here's some information about him...
Bernhard studied Law at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland and in Berlin, where he acquired a taste for fast cars, horse riding, and big-game hunting safaris. ... While at university, Bernhard joined the Nazi Party. He also enrolled in the Sturmabteilung (SA), which he left in 1934 when he graduated. The Prince later denied that he had belonged to SA, to the Reiter-SS (SS Cavalry Corps), and to the NSKK, but these are well-documented memberships. ... he was not a fierce champion of democracy ... The Prince eventually went to work for the German chemical giant IG Farben...
Prince Bernhard was an influential man with influential friends. We know he was a Nazi member who helped Nazis escape to Argentina while he was the director of Dutch airline KLM * While having been the first president of the WWF in 1961 he was a big fan of big-game hunting safaris. Later in life he held an important position at IG Farben, known for having been an important sponsor of Hitler's rise to power. And then there was the Lockheed Scandal which he always denied. A professional liar. And not surprisingly, he was not a big fan of democracy which understates his plans for globalization and thus also for the dismantling of nation states by taking away their sovereignty. He once said thatIt is difficult to re-educate people who have been brought up on nationalism to the idea of relinquishing part of their sovereignty to a supra-national body.Perhaps he studied law to be better able to place himself and his fellow power elite above the law. C. Wright Mills wrote thatthe very rich have used existing laws, they have circumvented and violated existing laws, and they have had laws created and enforced for their direct benefit.Prince Bernhard was also a Knight of Malta for the very powerful Catholic Church. In the photo Prince Bernhard and queen Juliana receive Suharto and his wife on 3 September 1970. Suharto was the dictator of Indonesia from 1967 to 1998 who was supported by the west because of his staunch anti-communism, among other things. He was known as a "war criminal" * and "one of the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century" *. Indonesia is linked to the Netherlands because of the colonial period. A good example to further examine in this context is Western New Guinea...
Western New Guinea
In 1936 Dutch explorer-geologist Jean Jaques Dozy discovered the presence of abundant copper ore in a mountain he called "Ertsberg" in Western New Guinea (or Papua) which later would become known as the Grasberg mine, the world's largest copper and gold mine. His discovery was recounted in a paper which was promptly ignored. In 1949 Indonesia became independent. Until that time the Dutch East Indies belonged to the Dutch Empire. Sukarno was the leader of the Indonesian struggle for independence. However, the Dutch retained sovereignty over Western New Guinea. In 1959 Forbes Wilson, exploration chief for Freeport Sulphur Co., learned of Ertsberg from Dozy's report. In 1960 he visited Ertsberg which proved to be the world's largest above-ground outcrop of copper, with indications of a much larger mineral district. In 1960 the Dutch explained the situation of Western New Guinea to president Kennedy and warned for possible Indonesian military intervention *. They also mentioned that Western New Guinea had always been separate from Indonesia, being different races of peoples. So already in 1960 there was a conflict between Indonesia and the Papuan people who wanted independence. In 1961 Sukarno asked president Kennedy for support in adding Western New Guinea (West Irian) to Indonesia *. He made clear to Kennedy that he wanted Indonesia to be independent of foreign powers. Also with the intent on nationalisation of foreign industries. Kennedy was reluctant. In 1962 the power elite overpowered the Dutch under pressure from the Kennedy administration. On 15 August 1962 the United Nations granted temporary authority to itself over Western New Guinea with the New York Agreement. In 1963 the United Nations granted authority to Indonesia. Since that time the Papua conflict intensified in Western New Guinea between Indonesia and the Free Papua Movement which was very underreported in the West. At the same time there was a struggle between Sukarno's Indonesia and British controlled Malaysia. The relation between Sukarno and the U.S. deteriorated and he even withdrew Indonesia from the United Nations on 7 January 1965 when Malaysia took a seat on the UN Security Council with U.S. backing. On the one hand Sukarno was pushed towards Soviet communism by the west and on the other hand he flirted with Soviet power and became more unpopular in the West. Sukarno had to be removed...
In 1967 the CIA-backed coup took place. It is no secret that the CIA was involved in the assassination of Sukarno who was accused of not being anti-communist enough. The CIA supported general Suharto who would become the cruel dictator of Indonesia, but friendly to the United States. Before the coup took place there was a period of chaos in Indonesia with bloody massacres of anything pro-communist, supported by the CIA. A top-secret CIA report from 1968 released in 2007 stated that the massacresrank as one of the worst mass murders of the 20th century. Of course the Rockefeller Commission investigating the CIA in 1975 would never publish any evidence about CIA involvement that would cause public outrage and attempted to whitewash the episode. After taking office Suharto started so-called de-Sukarnoization in an attempt to rewrite history in his favor, just like the power elite tried in the West.
In 1967, directly after Suharto became president, Freeport McMoRan became the first company to sign a contract under Indonesia's new foreign investment law * to exploit the world's largest copper mine and second largest gold mine: Grasberg mine in Western New Guinea. Since that time Freeport McMoRan is known for exploitation, cronyism, and environmental devastation * in Papua. The people involved in Freeport McMoRan were Gerald J. Ford, Henry Kissinger, Godfrey Stillman Rockefeller, and other rich business men. Here's what the US embassy in Indonesia reported to Washington in 1968...
Following the removal of Sukarno, our bilateral relations with Indonesia improved markedly. During 1967, American owned businesses, previously taken over under the Sukarno regime, were returned to their original owners, and several American firms, taking advantage of the present government’s liberal economic policies, concluded agreements for new investments in Indonesia. ... As a result of these and other factors, the US has become closely identified with the goals and efforts of the Suharto government. Such an identification is in fact inevitable since we have a heavy stake in the success of the “New Order” not only for obvious reasons related to Indonesia’s size, strategic importance, resources and potential strength but also because it is the latest test case of whether liberal economic policies combined with free world assistance offer a more solid path to modernization than communism or other totalitarian solutions.
Suharto violently repressed any political dissent by Papuan people who demanded independence for Western New Guinea. According to rights activists, more than 500,000 Papuans have been killed, and thousands more have been raped, tortured and imprisoned by the Indonesian military since 1969. *
President Nixon, who later resigned in 1974 due to the Watergate scandal, and national security adviser Henry Kissinger visited Jakarta in July 1969. Kissinger would later become board member of Freeport McMoRan from 1995 to 2001. He was one of the most frequent participants of the Bilderberg conference. From Nixon's declassified briefing papers * we now know that Kissinger gave the President the following advice...
Points to avoid: the West Irian "act of free choice" will be underway during your visit. It consists of a series of consultations, rather than a direct election, which would be almost meaningless among the stone age cultures of New Guinea. There is a UN observer on the scene, and we assume that U Thant will go along with the Indonesian form of the act of free choice. There is, however, a small but active West Papuan independence movement, and a variety of groups in Australia and the Netherlands which take exception to the Indonesian technique of self-determination. Because the U.S. played a mediating role in resolving the Indonesian/Dutch controversy over the future of West Irian, there may be a tendency to associate you with the form in which the act of free choice is being conducted. We should avoid any U.S. identification with that act.
On 2 August 1969 the so-called Act of Free Choice took place under the auspices of the United Nations. It was supposed to be a democratic vote of the Papuan people to decide whether or not to be part of Indonesia. In reality only 1,025 men and women out of 800,000 Papuans were selected to vote by the Indonesian military in Western New Guinea. The Indonesian military intimidated and threatened these people. This happened under auspices of United Nations observers. Thus western-backed Indonesian dictator Suharto gained complete rule through a UN-sanctioned but discredited ballot in 1969 which was a gross violation of human rights and democracy. In 2020, after more than half century of human rights abuses, genocide and looting of West Papua *, the United Nations came with the following statement...
Extraordinary. Could it be that the United Nations is a tool to further the agenda of the power elite, contrary to its beautiful and appealing statements about human rights? Yes! And Papua is a very good example of it. How many aggressive wars fought by the Anglo-American elite did the UN prevent? None! The power elite in the West, including the United Nations, were heavily involved in the bloody chaos in Indonesia, the bloody coup, and support for a cruel dictator's bloody puppet regime. All of this was done to make profit of Indonesia's resources. The United Nations is not an organization in favor of the common people, but first of all in favor of the power elite and their industries. And that's of course in line with how power works in the real world.
Club of Rome (1968)
In the photo Prince Bernhard hands over the Erasmus Prize to Alexander King who co-founded the Club of Rome with Aurelio Peccei who was an Italian industrialist and another one of the many so-called "philanthropists", super-rich people who want to "save mankind and the world from poverty and disaster"... an obvious contradiction in terms. According to themselves they found they shared a so-calledprofound concern for the long-term future of humanity and the planet*. The Club of Rome is another instrument of the Anglo-American power elite.
It presents itself as aleading think tank at world level. Organizations like the Club of Rome provide the power elite with the necessary ammunition in the form of reports like for example The Limits to Growth which talks about world population and of course overpopulation supported by carefully twisting and bending science in their own favor. In 1968 American biologist Paul R. Ehrlich, sponsored by the power elite, wrote thatA cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people... We must shift our efforts from treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions. The pain may be intense. But the disease is so far advanced that only with radical surgery does the patient have a chance of survival.Just goes to show how the elite think about the world and humanity. This is one aspect of their desired globalization...
In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself. The title of the paragraph from which this quote is taken readsThe common enemy of humanity is Manand it's followed by the chapterThe Human Malaise. They try to make you believe that you are the problem, but of course humanity itself is not the real enemy. The people who installed and now maintain the system based on materialism are the root cause of trouble. And those are the power elite themselves who obviously benefit from duping and milking taxpayers and when taxpayers no longer serve any purpose in their world they will simply discard them. They present a twisted view of the world in which they try to distract the people from the real source of the problems. On page 7 of their book these elite writeHumanity will have to be forever on guard against the rise of insane leaders with great charisma, capable of hypnotizing whole nations, and willing to destroy the world rather than go down in defeat.Sounds like a description of themselves. The Club of Rome has divisions all over the world.
we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we'd like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need [Scientists should consider stretching the truth] to get some broadbased support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This 'double ethical bind' we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.
Stephen H. Schneider is one of the members of the Club of Rome. Their way of working involves IndoctriNATION and propaganda. Hence the involvement of powerful media figures. As opposed to what he claims, true science never promotes to consider stretching the truth, it should be unbiased. Not surprisingly, these topics are highly politicized and therefore biased by definition. So their science is biased as well. The political elite have to sell these twisted ideas to the taxpayers and by putting the label "science" on them they have "convincing" ammunition to "convert" largely ignorant taxpayers who are taught from childhood to "trust" their government. It's a very clever system installed by themselves, almost religious. The elite at the Club of Rome are to a large extent responsible for the global climate change propaganda which is meant to extract more tax money from common taxpayers.
World Economic Forum (1971)
The World Economic Forum (WEF) says about itself that it iscommitted to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.Improving the state of the world? But for whom? Growing extreme inequality best answers that question. It also says about itself that it is anot-for-profit foundation... tied to no political, partisan or national interestsand that it worksin the global public interest. Some of WEF's leading members * are: Jim Yong Kim, president of the World Bank. Christine Lagarde, managing director, International Monetary Fund. Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England. Katherine Garrett-Cox, member of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG. Al Gore, the fanatic global warming clown. Herman Gref, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Executive Board, Sberbank. Luis Alberto Moreno, President, The Inter-American Development Bank. Min Zhu, Deputy Managing Director, International Monetary Fund. And besides representatives of those financial institutions it has some representatives of the world's leading industrial corporations. These people represent the banking world, IMF and the Worldbank and of course the world's largest and most powerful corporations whose elite leaders all have tremendous personal interests, the same ideas, and they have the governments in their pockets. Samuel Huntington described them asan elite group of highly educated people who operate in the rarefied domains of international finance, media, and diplomacy... [who] share common beliefs about individualism, democracy, and market economics.See also The Great Reset.
Trilateral Commission (1973)
The Trilateral Commission is a global membership organization that for decades has brought together senior policymakers, business leaders, and representatives of media and academe to discuss and propose solutions to some of the world’s toughest problems. Founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller, the Commission has long been an important venue to incubate ideas and form relationships across sectors and geographies.
Also this organization is about Atlanticism and Americanization. The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller. In the photo a Trilateral Commission meeting with President Gerald Ford in 1974. To Ford's left David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, a very influential foreign policy advisor to the United States. Zbigniew Brzezinski co-founded the Trilateral Commission. These councils are all about power and globalization.
In this photo U.S. president Gerald Ford and Henry Kissinger, the earlier mentioned influential foreign policy advisor of the U.S. who participated in the Trilateral Commission and who would become board member from 1995 to 2001 of the beforementioned company that exploits Indonesian resources and people. Here they meet with Indonesian president Suharto and vice president Adam Malik on 6 December 1975 in Jakarta, Indonesia. Adam Malik was also President of the United Nations General Assembly in 1971. Ford and Kissinger gave their approval * for the Indonesian occupation of East Timor in 1975 that left perhaps 200,000 dead in the years since *. Suharto, as mentioned earlier in this chapter, is known for being a war criminal and one of the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century. Ironically, Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 by his fellow globalist friends forhaving negotiated a cease fire in Vietnam in 1973. We all know the legacy of the Vietnam War. Kissinger is also famous for his 1975 quoteLet us fashion together a New World Order.Later in his life in 2014 he wrote a book called World Order which is abouthow to build a shared international order in a world of divergent historical perspectives, violent conflict, proliferating technology, and ideological extremism.See Realpolitik. Kissinger is one of the foremost and influential globalists of the last decades and one of the main architects of the coming world government which will be ruled by these kind of people.
The Rockefeller File
The Rockefeller family is an American industrial, political, and banking family that made one of the world's largest fortunes in the oil business during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with John D. Rockefeller and his brother William Rockefeller primarily through Standard Oil. The family is also known for its long association with and control of Chase Manhattan Bank. They are considered to be one of the most powerful families, if not the most powerful family, in the history of the United States.
Of course the Rockefeller Foundation presents itself as a promoter of the well-being of humanity around the world. But really? The Rockefeller Foundation was started by Standard Oil owner John D. Rockefeller who played a major role in the rise of Hitler and fascism in Germany. Or what about the killing of his own working people who protested for better rights and a better life instead of inhumane working conditions imposed by Rockefeller? In 1911 the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey guilty of monopolizing the petroleum industry through a series of abusive and anticompetitive actions. Would the very founders of such a foundation really be concerned about the well-being of all the people in the world? It would take all the stupidity in the world to believe that the ultra-rich are going to save mankind from disaster and poverty. Here's what David Rockefeller said in 2002...
Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
David Rockefeller is founder of the earlier mentioned Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission which have much influence on the foreign policy of the United States and its allies, and thus on world events. In the picture he sits with one of his fellow globalist friends and so-called philanthropists Lord Jacob Rothschild who belongs to one of the world's most wealthy and powerful families. The Rothschild family is an international banking family known for having established European wide banking in 1800 *. In the 19th century they lent money to Kings and governments and funded both sides in the Napoleonic wars. They once saved the Bank of England from collapse with their own money. Here's the maxim of the House of Rothschilds...
Let us control the money of a country and we care not who makes its laws." This the maxim of the House of Rothschilds, and it is the foundation principle of European banks. If a country and its people are mortgaged for the assessed value of their property, and the bankers control the money, the bondholders and not the people own that country. It makes no difference whether you call it a republic or a monarchy. The people can never be free "as the borrower is the servant of the lender.
We don't know how rich the world's wealthiest families really are. That says enough. The same goes for the extremely powerful Catholic Church. The Rockefellers and Rothschilds are not mentioned in Forbes' The World's Billionaires or Business Insider's 50 richest people on earth. Maybe because they belong to the category trillionaires. These people control the media and have the power to stay behind the scenes. They undoubtedly control much of world events to their own benefit via their many NGO's, think tanks, so-called "philanthropical" organizations and connections. It includes of course also the world's monarchies like for example the British Royal family and the Dutch Royal family of which Prince Bernhard was a member. C. Wright Mills stated thatThe course of events in our time depends more on a series of human decisions than on any inevitable fate. ... As the circle of those who decide is narrowed, as the means of decision are centralized and the consequences of decisions become enormous, then the course of great events often rests upon the decisions of determinable circles.To know which people really rule this world we have to follow the money. To be rich the rest has to be relatively poor. Inequality has spiraled completely out of proportion in the last decades and that is surely no accident. Here's a nice conversation between an intelligent man who has his facts straight and a typical useful idiot of the power elite who tries to wave away observable reality as a "silly conspiracy theory"...
The Rockefeller File is not fiction. It is a compact, powerful and frightening presentation of what may be the most important story of our lifetime, the drive of the Rockefellers and their allies to create a one world government, combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control. For more than one hundred years, since the days when John D. Rockefeller Sr. used every devious strategy he could devise to create a gigantic oil monopoly, enough books have been written about the Rockefellers to fill a library. I have read many of them. And to my knowledge, not one has dared reveal the most vital part of the Rockefeller story: that the Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic power to gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do.
Larry McDonald was right. The goal of these power elite is a global empire or a world government. On 1 September 1983 Larry McDonald was a passenger on Korean Air Lines Flight 007 from New York to Seoul. It was shot down by a Soviet fighter aircraft after entering Soviet territory supposedly due to a navigational mistake made by the crew. The Soviets found the wreckage under the Sea of Japan on September 15, and found the flight recorders in October, but this information was kept secret until 1993.