The United Nations is the mother of all globalist organizations. According to itself...

The United Nations came into being in 1945, following the devastation of the Second World War, with one central mission: the maintenance of international peace and security. The UN does this by working to prevent conflict; helping parties in conflict make peace; peacekeeping; and creating the conditions to allow peace to hold and flourish.*

"Peace and security" is a very popular slogan by the globalist elite. It is what they said before with the creation of the League of Nations directly after World War I. But World War I was not the end of war because the so-called "peace" Treaty of Versailles was the prelude to World War II. And the end of World War II was the beginning of the Cold War. Currently we are in the New Cold War. Many aggressive wars were fought led by the United States and the United Kingdom, two permanent members of the UN Security Council, and none of them were prevented by the UN.

According to the Charter of the United Nations...

Membership in the United Nations is open to all other peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations.*

But for example South Africa became member when it ruled by means of a racist apartheid regime. Chile went from dictator to dictator during its UN membership. Saudi Barbaria, the world's foremost sponsor of Islamic terrorism, was a member from the beginning. Ukraine is known as the most corrupt nation in Europe. The Soviet Union was led by Joseph Stalin, the mass murderer who made Hitler look like a schoolboy. Argentina's Peronism was labeled Latin American fascism. Many nations were human rights abusers when they became members and they were human rights abusers during their memberships.

The 5 UN Security Council permanent members are generally the largest arms dealers: US, Russia, China, UK and France. They make profit from wars. They are all nuclear powers and form a nuclear veto club which tells the rest of the world to do as they say, not as they do. For example Iran has the right to a peaceful, domestic nuclear energy program* which is affirmed by international law via the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran is a sovereign nation which has the right to defend itself from a possible attack from for example enemies like Israel or the United States who are known for their aggression in the Middle East and beyond. Iran is prohibited from nuclear energy by especially Israel and the United States. In 2006 John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt stated that since 1982, the U.S. has vetoed 32 Security Council resolutions critical of Israel, more than the total number of vetoes cast by all the other Security Council members.* Israel was a creation made possible by the US and the UN.

The Oil-for-Food Programme was introduced by United States President Bill Clinton's administration in 1995, as a response to arguments that ordinary Iraqi citizens were inordinately affected by the international economic sanctions aimed at the demilitarisation of Saddam Hussein's Iraq, imposed in the wake of the first Gulf War. It was plagued by corruption and all this happened under the auspices of Boutros Boutros-Ghali, sixth Secretary-General of the United Nations. He would later be replaced by Kofi Annan who was accused of gross mismanagement in the final report of the Paul Volcker Committee...

The 500-page report paints an ugly tableau of bribery, kickbacks, corruption, and fraud on a global scale-without a doubt the biggest financial scandal in modern history. It amply demonstrates how the Iraqi dictator generously rewarded those who supported the lifting of U.N. sanctions on Iraq and who paid lip-service to his barbaric regime. Oil-for-Food became a shameless political charade through which Saddam Hussein attempted to manipulate decision-making at the U.N. Security Council by buying the support of influential figures in Russia and France.*

Benon Sevan was the head of the Oil-for-Food Programme. He stonewalled efforts to review and investigate the programme. Probably because he was charged with taking nearly $160,000 in bribes and later fled to his native Cyprus.*

Natwar Singh stepped down as foreign minister of India in November 2005 amid allegations that he and his son had benefited from the scam.* Later in 2014 he wrote a book called One Life in which he sticks feathers up his own ass and blames other politicians in India for corruption. "One life" is certainly not enough for all the corruption and lies these kind of people have in store for the world.

According to the BBC more than 2,000 firms linked to the UN oil-for-food programme in Iraq were involved.* The western banking cartel was also involved because such level of corruption needs a financial backbone to be possible in the first place.

The UN has to date not been effective in preventing genocide, and has had only a slightly better record in stopping it. There have been occasions when its interventions has occurred only after a genocide has taken place, and even then its major focus has been on facilitating the provision of aid by non-governmental agencies rather than on the task of tracking down the perpetrators and bringing them to justice.

The UN was unable to respond effectively to the genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, the Balkans and Darfur.

The Srebrenica massacre and the Darfur crisis are examples where the UN failed miserably in preventing genocide. See for example the documentary Srebrenica massacre: Is it meant to be? In 1995 the United Nations failed miserably to protect thousands of innocent people, whom they promised to protect with help of NATO air defense. Then in 1999 they let NATO bomb Yugoslavia to oblivion in order to change its regime in favor of its most powerful members. See also NATO Imperialism. It's safe to say that thanks to the United Nations genocides keep taking place. On top of that, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the UN World Health Organization, is accused of aiding genocide in Ethiopia.* This genocide in Ethiopia is completely underreported in the West.* See also UNhealth.

The Rockefeller Foundation played an important role in the transition from the League of Nations to the United Nations through its collaboration with two international organisations. The first was the Economic, Financial and Transit Department (EFTD) of the LoN. By financing its move to the United States and all of its work during the Second World War, the RF would allow it to make a major contribution to the reorganisation of the global economic order after 1945. The second organisation was the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA), which the RF provided with staff, working methods, and a network of contacts around the world. The RF was thus deeply involved in the redefinition of the overall structure of the system of international organisations during WWII.

The Rockefellers are globalists with tremendous power and they were instrumental in the decision to locate the United Nations in New York.* On 25 March 1947 the Rockefellers gave the Secretary-General of the United Nations a check of $8,500,000 for the purchase of the 6-block Manhattan East River site.* The Rockefeller Foundation has supported United Nations programs throughout its history. Ironically, the UN headquarters are built on the site of a former slaughter house where so many livestock were killed that the area used to be called “blood alley.”*

In 2013, a UN investigation declared sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) ‘the most significant risk to UN peacekeeping missions, above and beyond other key risks including protection of civilians’. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon himself asserted that ‘a single substantiated case of [SEA] involving UN personnel is one case too many’. Yet civilian and military personnel associated with peacekeeping operations (PKOs) continue to perpetrate SEA, despite the development of policy frameworks designed to prevent it and hold perpetrators accountable.

In March 2016, the United Nations Security Council adopted its first resolution devoted entirely to the prevention of peacekeeper sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) in peace operations. This article examines resolution 2272 by drawing on past practice and the perspective of those at mission sites—namely, Timor-Leste—arguing that the mechanism it establishes—repatriation—is limited in its capacity to prevent SEA and provide justice outcomes. The article demonstrates the pervasive sense of powerlessness regarding SEA and the impunity of those who do perpetrate SEA.

UN peacekeeping missions are plagued by sexual abuse involving mostly women and children.* What is known about this is only the tip of the iceberg because there is strong underreporting of sexual abuse and of course the globalist elite will do everything in their power to prevent the world from knowing too much about it.

It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favour of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion.

World peace and security is obviously an illusion in a world ruled by these globalist elite who place themselves above the law. They created and maintain international law for the whole world, but place themselves above it. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Peace is not in the nature of the beast.